democracy alert
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Videos
  • Voting Systems
    • Powerpoints >
      • FPTP
      • Dual Member Proportional
      • Proportional FPTP
      • Mixed Member Proportional
      • Weighted Voting
    • Handouts
  • Our Schools
    • Curriculum Initiatives
    • School Culture
    • For educators
    • Submission to NL Task Force on Education
  • Book Reviews
    • Voting Trends
    • Inequality
    • Power Shift
    • The Economy

One More Reason for Proportional Representation

9/5/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
​The last six federal elections have produced two "majority" governments with less than 40% voter support, and four short term minority governments. Yet, our two major parties continue to claim that our first-past-the-post electoral system is stronger and longer lasting than PR governments. 

​Here's what is wrong with that argument as published  in our 
Letter to the Telegram.  

Sept. 4th 2021

​The Trudeau government has called an election less than two years into their mandate.  Why? 

​Probably, because they want to get rid of their minority government status at a time when they believe they are popular in the polls.

In spite of the fact that four of the last six federal governments in Canada have been minority governments, our two major parties  will likely continue to call snap elections, simply to avoid having to collaborate in any way with other parties. According to Wikipedia the average duration of minority governments at the federal level in Canada has been a mere 479 days.  

This is both indulgent and disruptive.

Clearly, the time to opt for proportional representation (PR) is overdue.  Even in Britain, the birth place of our first-past-the-post system, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland  have now chosen to use PR in  their regional parliaments or assemblies. In doing so they have embraced the concept that the percentage of seats a party holds should match the percentage of votes it receives. 

​Contrast that with Canada where the two recent “majority” governments  (2011 & 2015) were both won with less than 40% of voter support.  

Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish citizens are also at ease with the idea that the different parties  will work collaboratively in the coalition governments that proportional representation systems so often produce.  What’s noteworthy with respect to the duration of these UK coalition governments,  is that almost all have lasted a full term. 

This raises  questions for us. Given the regularity of short-term minority governments, why does government continue to resist the formation of a Citizens’ Assembly to look at the merits of switching to a proportional representation system?  Whose interests are being served here?

I don’t believe it is that of ordinary citizens. 

Marilyn Reid
Conception Bay South



0 Comments

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.